Ozymandias and the Grecian Urn Paper

completely the same though Ozymandias by Percy Shelley and Ode to a classic Urn by John Keats sound ilk very diametric types of numberss, they unruffled conduct some of the same characteristics. In Ozymandias, Shelley divides a story of how a man represent a ancient statue of a big businessman, with the terminology My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings,/ Look on my Works, ye Might, and despair The statue was broken into pieces, and the land was bargon, with cryptograph to look on (11).In Ode to a Greek Urn, Keats is speaking to an ancient urn and describing the unchanging pictures that be on it. These numberss be very protestent in how their objects interact with the tone ending of cartridge clip and in the feelings that they invoke in the lector, further very similar in the amorous characteristics that they represent. Ozymandias and Ode to a classical Urn are very discordent in how the statue and the urn interact with the passing of epoch. In Ozymandias, Shelley shows how a manmade object is washed-up in time by constitution.Not wholly is the statue demeaned, but it is also obvious that the t avouchsfolk has also been undone when Shelley states that, Nothing beside remains. calendar method of birth control the decay/ Of that colossal Wreck, unlimited and advertise (12-13). Nature has the ability to destroy everything that a man can wanton away, anything from a simple(a) statue to an sinless town. However, Ode to a Grecian Urn is an entire poem about a manmade object that has withstood the passage of time and anything nature threw its way.Keats states that take down When old age shall this generation drift/ Thou shalt remain (46-47). Keats does non tear down acknowledge the fact that nature could destroy the urn in a split second. Since the urn is a Sylvan historian, it has been around for a while, significance it has probably been through some reading material of a natural disaster or at the very least a rough sto rm, and nature still has not chosen to destroy it (3). Shelleys poem and Keatss poem also differ in the feelings that they invoke in the reader. Ozymandias has a very off-putting sound to it.Shelley puts dustup that form negative connotations to them resembling when he is describing the king with a frown/ And contract lip, and sneer of cold statement (4-5). The poem gives the reader a feeling of loneliness and emptiness by using lines like The lone and level sandpaper and boundless and bare (14, 13). In Ode to a Grecian Urn, the connotations of the words that Keats uses are completely opposite. Keats even describes the urn as being able to tell A flowery tale more sweetly than their rhyme (4).Keats then goes on to state that the melodies unheard/ Are sweeter therefore, ye piano pipes, play on (11-12). These lines are so light and pretty especially compared to the rigor of Shelleys poem. Keats describes the beautiful pictures on the urn throughout the rest of the poem, even making a sacrifice sound peaceful. Even though the way the poems objects interact with the passing of time and the feelings the poems invoke in the reader differ greatly, the romantic characteristics that some(prenominal) poems symbolize are very similar.Ironically, the opposite parallels of the two poems nurture a way of representing a romantic mindset. For example, the romantics believed that nature is alleged(a) to teach. In Ozymandias, nature destroys a statue and a town that had arisen from covetousness and the abuse of forefinger. The king is stated to oblige a sneer of cold command and a heart that fed his own desires (4,8). The trunkless legs of stone and a shattered mugful makes it sound like nature was not very happy with the kings show of authority (2, 4).In Ode to a Grecian Urn, the manmade object not being destroyed by nature can still teach the reader. The urn was not made for power and greed, but to show beauty and love. The urn depicts some scenes of nature and peacefulness. Another similarity that twain poems share is that they show the insignificance of something that is supposed to be great, like a king, and the value of something that is supposed to be ordinary, like an urn. Once again, in Ozymandias, the king and his great town are destroyed.This seems like Shelleys way of grow for the revolutions, of making a king not so important anymore. After all is said and done, the lone and level sands stretch far away (14). No matter whether one is a king or a peasant, everyone dies, and in the end, being a king does not make you greater than a peasant. In Ode to a Grecian Urn, Keats glorifies the common urn. He makes the urn, which could have probably been found in umteen homes, seem special to the reader. Like legion(predicate) romantics, he took an ordinary item and saturnine it into an extraordinary one.Shelleys Ozymandias and Keatss Ode to a Grecian Urn differ in the slipway that the statue and the urn interact with the passing of time and in the feelings that they invoke in the readers however, they still ironically share similar romantic characteristics. The poems may not seem very parallel at first, but once the reader considers what each poet is trying to convey, they do not seem so different afterwards all. Again, it is the ironic and opposite parallels that actually chip in up to express the same beliefs of both poets.