Pro Death Penalty Essay Example for Free

Pro ending Penalty adjudicateThe conclusion penalisation should be unbroken as a punishment in our court forms. It should be kept because it helps crime rates drop, helps give closure, serves plainlyice, and more. Even though it gives a great outcome to the system at that place atomic number 18 pack who argue against it. People against put that capital punishment is not rite, costless people ram killed, and its barbarous and peculiar punishment yet none of those facts be proven, in fact, in that location is prove against them. Ultimately the death penalisation helps bon ton feel split and be a better place. The death penalty prevents more murders in society by causing one that is deserved. This is because people get excite of giving up every(prenominal)thing for nothing. They think twice before they take a life because they basis be punished by getting their life taken. The death penalty stops most people from killing another(prenominal)s over stupid things like money, arguments, etc. Most of the people that do commit murders each dont c ar about there life, didnt mean to, or catch some kind of anger or psychiatric problem like being psychotic, schizophrenic, bipolar and more. Many people tried to prove that the death penalty prevented murders, exactly there attempts were inconclusive. In 1973 Isaac Ehlrich engaged in an analysis which results showed that for every criminal penalize 7 lives were saved (MSU) only because people were sc ard of the death penalty and didnt want to take a chance with there life. The many people that appose the death penalty say that the death penalty doesnt prevent murders, but causes them.Like criminologist William Bowers of Northeastern University says Society is hurt by the use of the death penalty, this ups the likeliness of more murder. (MSU) I think that this is an insane idea. Even if society was brutalized by the use of the death penalty, why would they ever even think of committing more murde rs. The more murders that they commit the more the state would have to objurgate the death penalty thus making what they were brutalized by even worse. What about all the criminals in our prisons that are serving life sentences. Life imprisonment is the worst punishment next to the death penalty and without that there is nothing left to punish the inmates with. If the inmate knows that it washstandt get worse than that they could kill guard and do whatever they wanted. When there is a punishment of death the inmates have to think that they are in lag and its not a nice place there but at least they are alive. attain is very severe crime and loafer not be handled lightly. As stated by MSU when somebody kills somebody they must be punished equally as they should be for any other crime. This keep be related to the saying an eye for an eye of course we dont take it to as great fulfilment as they did before. If a teenager steels something like a CD they will get a sure amount of c ommunity service. This is basically being forced to do volunteer work to pay jeopardize for what you would have stolen and extra hours as a punishment. In an act of murder the victims family gets extremely traumatized. The damage caused can never be fixed. If the victim was say caught in a crossfire some family members might be scared to go outside. They could have nightmares and much more can happen. If the murderer is put to justice and executed at least they will have some kind of closure and know that the murderer is not sufficient to commit any more murders. mod Media Mill states that only good has happened since the judicature reinstated the death penalty after the court case Gregg vs. Georgia (1976).Ever since it was reinstated murder rates have dropped in well-nigh all the states from 30% to 65%. Today, about 70% of America is for the death penalty even though there are a few problems just as there is in any other system. The main problem is executing and exculpated per son. According to MSU there is no proof of any sincere person getting executed. It would be extremely hard to happen because of all the safeguards and appeals added in the 1970s. Even if an innocent has been executed it is very rare. It wouldnt be rite to try an stop the death penalty because of some unproved fact, thats like saying there are innocent people in prison so prohibit prison.There is no way you can be 100% sure which inmates are innocent and which ones are not, and you cant re-investigate all there cases because that would take too much man power and time. The people that do get out of death course normally get out because of legal technicalities. If someone can be proven innocent the governor will grant them clemency. The other claims are usually just delaying tactics (MSU). This is way the court has the appeal system which allows the inmate to postpone the execution. According to statistics on New Media Mill it is more likely to take a guilty man off death row and put him in a normal prison for life than it is to execute an innocent man.People say that the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment if anything the system goes way too easy on the death row inmates. Some murderers kill people in the most brutal, disgusting, and unimaginable ways and they are executed by lethal injection. They get to die in there sleep without any torture or suffering. They die the way everyone wishes they die. In my eyes, thats not considered a punishment comparing it to how some inmates have killed people. For example Michele Ross got the death penalty and was killed by painless lethal injection after raping and killing eighter from Decatur women. The people put on death row should be killed in a harsher way. According to MSU government isnt giving cruel and unusual punishment by lethal injection, people should be happy that they are nice enough to execute the inmates so peacefully.I could understand people seeing it as cruel and unusual if the government banned lethal injection and left the inmates with a choice of the other four methods for execution which are hanging, gas chamber, firing squad, and electrocution which cause pain (MSU). When hanging the person drops with the snare drum around his neck so that it snaps his neck. Instant death doesnt always happen so the person sometimes suffocates. Using the gas chamber they sit the person in a result and fill the fashion until he chokes from the lethal gas. The firing squad gives a shot to the heart and kills the person in a few seconds or if the heart is missed the person bleeds to death. When being electrocuted the person is tied to a chair while they put 2000 volts of electricity through them. During lethal injection the person is put to sleep indeed paralyzed then given a liquid witch stops all function in the body. As you see execution cant get much better than lethal injection. Cruel and unusual is when Ronell Wilson shot and killed detectives James Nemorin and Rodney An drews in 2003 (Google News).Hopefully you know realize that the death penalty should be kept as a punishment in our court systems. It has helped crime rates in almost every state drop, it has given closure to many families, it has served justice, and more. There will always be people advance up with reasons why the death penalty should be stopped. Reasons like cruel and unusual punishment, that it hurts society, and more but in the end it is the main thing that stops people from going out of control and makes society a better place.Work CitedGoogle News. The Death Penalty. 2006. 11/25/06. http//news.google.com/news?q=for+the+death+penaltyMichigan State University. The Death Penalty. 2006. 11/21/06. http//www.deathpenaltyinfo.msu.eduNew Media Mill. DPIC. 2006. 11/20/06. http//www.deathpenaltyinfo.org