How Technology Affects our Lives Essay

Technology is very much a share of modern life. Many people see technology as sop up that escaped from human control, others feel that technology has correctd the quality of life. The let go of of technology being a part of modern life is a controversial 1. Some feel that the contribution of technology has made a positive impact in modern life that technology helps improve the quality of life. But stock-still its in a better-looking question. Technologys role in our lives is astonishing. Its effect on the centering we communicate has changed the English language forever. In In the Beginning Was the battle cry Christine Rosen tells how technology has a huge negative effect on our lives today. She as well as explains that because we are so attached to our electronic devices, we are creating more distractions for ourselves. In Three Tweets for the Web Tyler Cowen believes that internet soon give completely subjugate discussions. He also says that technology is forcing us to multitask.Today for younger generation internet can provide faster and more accurate knowledge on Google than going to a library and doing a research. Cowen begins his essay that printed contrive isnt dead yet and that we wont end up on internet. He says For todays younger people, Google is more apparent to provide a formative cultural experience than The Catcher in the Rye or Catch-22 or even the Harry Potter novels. at that place is no question that books are becoming less central to our cultural life (245). We need to get the information quickly, we dont want to wait extra hours or even days for it. Rosen says Today, of course, abridgment and abridgment are the norm, and our impatience for information has trained even those of us who never cracked an issue of Readers Digest to prefer 60-second newsworthiness cycles to 62 condensed pages per month (204). We pay more attention to the information which we got from the internet, than we did anyplace else. At the same time te chnology is fashioning us multitask, multitasking is non an free thing to do and it takes a lot of brain activity.Cowen writes The cumulus migration of intellectual activity from print to the Web has brought one important organic evolution We gather in begun paying more attention to information. Overall, that is a big summation for the new world order (246). He also mentions It is easy to plunder this cornucopia as information overload. We have all seen people scrolling with one hand through a BlackBerry while pecking out vociferous messages (IMs) on a laptop with the other and eyeing a television (Iwill not say watching). But even though it is easy to see signs of overload in our busy lives, the reality is that most of us carefully regulate this massive inflow of information to create something uniquely suited to our particular interests and needs a rich and highly individualized blend of cultural gleanings (246). Technology has even pushed authors to make the readings more consumer-friendly. Rosen explains that The digital revolution has also transformed the experience of reading by making it more consumer-oriented. With the advent of electronic readers (and cellphones that can double as e-readers), the book is no longer merely a thing you purchase, but a service to which you bear.With the purchase of a traditional book, your consumer ends when you walk out of the bookstore. With a wirelessly connected Kindle or Iphone, or your Wi-Fi-enabled calculating machine, you exist in a perpetual state of potential consumerism (205). To sum everything up both, Christine Rosen and Tylen Cowen thinks that technology does have a huge impact to the language. It still has some good features, such as it allows us to multitask faster and better, we can save time by just looking something up we need on Google, and for last if we still want to read a book, we can always just subscribe to a e-book provider, then you just download the e-book on your phone, tablet, or computer and here you go So what all that means is that technology didnt really killed printed word, even though were most likely to train to read electronically, we still read.