Leadership and Management Paper Essay

Ursula M. fire is the Chairman and Chief decision maker Officer ( chief executive officer) of drive away. She has held this position for the last 5 years. She started out as a pass intern in 1980, and signed on in 1981. From then until she became CEO she has guide several(prenominal) blood teams and positions within photocopy, exclusively along growing within the company. check to Fortune, she is the 22nd most powerful charr in the world. In addition to the run off board, she is a board director of the Ameri give notice Express Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation. burn in addition provides draws counsel to community, educational and non-profit organizations including foremost (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology), theme Academy Foundation, MIT, and the U.S. Olympic Committee, among others. She is a grounding board director of wobble the Equation, and electric electric chair Barack Obama appointed Burns vice chair of the Presidents Export Council ( absquatulate Ursula Burns, CEO, 2014).leaders and Management attribute a management title does not necessarily equate to holding lead skills. Leadership is defined in umpteen ways, and depending on who you ask apprize plainly be coordinating the work of others. yet that is taking a very particular(a) view on leadership. Leadership is a combination of rationale, inspiration, science, and art. It is said, Leaders be vista to do the right thing, dapple managers do things right (Hughes, Ginnett, & Curphy, 2009). Not tout ensemble leaders ar managers, look at Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. He is argumentatively the most important Civil Rights leader, that many would not look to him as a manager. According to Forbes, Ursula has made Xerox a profitable and viable company, this outgoing year, Burns helped Xerox generate ad notwithstandinged earnings per sh atomic number 18 of $1.09, up from $1.02 in 2012, and post $21.4 billion in full-year revenue (Forbes, 2014). Her skills as a manager assisted in building Xerox to the power-house they are today.Burns is responsible for the largest acquisition in Xerox history, and has allowed them to invest in business services, which is a $600 billion industry. Making these decisions requires stern decisions, including outsourcing, closing offices that are not execute well, and adopting a work from home culture. Because of this Burns has found herself on the 2014 lather CEO list put together by 24/7 Wall alley and Glassdoor. Burns received a tyrannical review from fewer that the 140,000 employees Xerox gained in the business services acquisition. Only 30% approved of her act (Brown, 2014). Also something that does not help Burns gain leadership approval is the fact that she was paid on sightly $13 zillion dollars for 2010 2012, while over 500 people were move off. While Burns has made moves in hopes of ensuring the stability of Xerox on that point are some that are calling for her to be fired. Burns recent letter to shareholders showed just how badly the transaction had gone.Over the cross of 2010 to 2013, revenue, net income and operating margins are flavorless to shoot down. In particular, revenue fell 1% to $21.4 billion in 2013. In the fourth quarter, revenue dropped 3% to $5.7 billion. Net income was down 1% to $1.2 billion last year. In the fourth quarter, the drop was 4% to $311 million (McIntyre, 2014). When bar success of a leader, thither are many ways to do that and depending on which way is chosen could fabricate different results. Using unit functioning indices, Burns appears to be very undefeated as a leader. Unit performance indices can be used to take apart what impact leaders have on the bottom lines of their organizations.Since she has taken over as CEO, Xerox shares have gone up 50% and the S & P is higher by nearly century% (Brown, 2014). Based on this information and her average salary the board must be happy with how she is performing. H owever, another way to measurement success is by subordinates ratings of effectiveness. Subordinates whitethorn be relatively satisfied or dissatisfied, may be motivated or unmotivated, may feel relatively committed or uncommitted to the organization, or may count their leader is relatively effective or ineffective. Because Burns has found herself on the score CEOs list of 2014 it can be said that she has been unsuccessful as a leader (Hughes, Ginnett, & Curphy, 2009). oddmentOverall it is important to remember that there are many dynamics to measuring leadership and management. Leadership and management can have many different meanings. Burns is a prime example of this. I believe she is an effective manager, because businesses are in the business of making money and her shareholders are happy. She also sits on the board of several inspirational companies like FIRST and Change the Equation, which could have many people look at her leadership abilities. However, when it comes to Xerox her uncomplicated focus is making the shareholders happy, when could indicate she is not being a true leader in a way that motivates, inspires, encourages, or simply speaks to their employees.RefrencesHughes, R.L., Ginnett, R.C., &e Curphy, G.J. (2009). Leadership Enhancing the Lessons of Experience (6th ed.). New York, NY McGraw-Hills.Xerox Ursula Burns, CEO. (2014). Retrieved fromhttp//www.xerox.com/about-xerox/executive-leadership/ chief executive officer/enus.htmlMcIntyre, D.A. (2014). Time for Xerox Board to chevy CEO Burns. Retrieved from http//247wallst.com/investing/2014/03/20/time-for-xerox-board-to-fire-ceo-burns/Brown, A. (2014). Xeroxs Ursula Burns Named One of Worst CEOs in corporate America. Retrieved from http//madamenoire.com/418058/xeroxs-ursula-burns-named-one-worst-ceos-corporate-america/Forbes 22 Ursula Burns. (2014). Retrieved fromhttp//www.forbes.com/profile/ursula-burns/